Orzecznictwo w zakresie prawa IP i prawa IT

Issues:
Opposition proceedings.
Relative ground for refusal.
Likelihood of confusion.
To annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 June 2004 – R 909/2002-4 – Orsay (word/figurative mark) / D’ORSAY (word/figurative mark) and Decision 2562/2002 of the Opposition Division of OHIM of 28 August 2002 insofar as registration of the Community trade mark sought by application No 1 042 605 was refused for the goods ‘clothing, boots, shoes and slippers; headgear’, on the ground of Opposition No B 242 075.

Trade marks concerned:
Orsay.

Findings:
—

Judgment text:
T-378/04, Orsay v. OHMI.

Published:
—

Issues:
Opposition proceedings.
Relative ground for refusal.
Likelihood of confusion.

Trade marks concerned:
GALVALLOY, earlier national word mark GALVALLIA.

Findings:
No likelihood of confusion.

Judgment text:
T-189/05, Usinor v. OHMI.

Published:
—

Issues:
Opposition proceedings.
Likelihood of confusion.
To annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 February 2006 in Case R 227/2005-1.

Trade marks concerned:
—

Findings:
—

Judgment text:
T-146/06, Sanofi-Aventis v. OHMI.

Published:
—

Issues:
Invalidity proceedings.
Community figurative mark.
Earlier Community and national figurative and word marks.
Relative ground for invalidity.

Trade marks concerned:
IDEA, IKEA.

Findings:
No likelihood of confusion.

Judgment text:
T-112/06, Inter-IKEA v. OHMI.

Published:
—

Issues:
Relative ground for refusal.
Likelihood of confusion.

Trade marks concerned:
AMPLITUDE, AMPLY.

Findings:
—

Judgment text:
T-9/05, Hoya v OHMI.

Published:
—