<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Orzecznictwo w zakresie prawa IP i prawa IT &#187; Prior Art</title>
	<atom:link href="http://orzecznictwo.net/category/prawo-amerykanskie/prawo-patentowe/prior-art/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://orzecznictwo.net</link>
	<description>Prawo IP &#38; IT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 23:09:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SRI Int’l v. Internet Security Systems (Fed. Cir. 2008)</title>
		<link>http://orzecznictwo.net/sri-int%e2%80%99l-v-internet-security-systems-fed-cir-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://orzecznictwo.net/sri-int%e2%80%99l-v-internet-security-systems-fed-cir-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 13:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[35 USC 102(b)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prawo patentowe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prior Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wpisy w języku angielskim]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/orzecznictwo/archives/32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Holding: A scientific paper posted to non-Indexed FTP site is not recognized a prior art (as defined 35 USC 102(b)). Reasoning: The court found insufficient evidence to rule on summary judgment. The FTP server was publicly accessible. However, it was uncataloged and would have been difficult to search. Additionally, only one non-SRI person (the conference [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Holding:</strong><br />
A scientific paper posted to non-Indexed FTP site is not recognized a prior art (as defined 35 USC 102(b)).</p>
<p><strong>Reasoning:</strong><br />
The court found insufficient evidence to rule on summary judgment. The FTP server was publicly accessible. However, it was uncataloged and would have been difficult to search. Additionally, only one non-SRI person (the conference chair) was shown to have knowledge of the paper on the FTP site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://orzecznictwo.net/sri-int%e2%80%99l-v-internet-security-systems-fed-cir-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

