<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Orzecznictwo w zakresie prawa IP i prawa IT &#187; Doctrine of Equivalents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://orzecznictwo.net/category/prawo-amerykanskie/prawo-patentowe/doctrine-of-equivalents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://orzecznictwo.net</link>
	<description>Prawo IP &#38; IT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 23:09:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Wleklinski (dba Comfort Strapp) v. Targus (Fed. Cir. 2007)</title>
		<link>http://orzecznictwo.net/wleklinski-dba-comfort-strapp-v-targus-fed-cir-2007/</link>
		<comments>http://orzecznictwo.net/wleklinski-dba-comfort-strapp-v-targus-fed-cir-2007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Doctrine of Equivalents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prawo patentowe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wpisy w języku angielskim]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/orzecznictwo/?p=4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Holding: The Federal Circuit panel agreed that as a matter of law, the doctrine of equivalents does not allow a claimed two-material strap to encompass a strap made of only one material. According to the appellate panel, such a reading would be “the fundamental opposite of the claimed invention”.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Holding:</strong><br />
The Federal Circuit panel agreed that as a matter of law, the doctrine of equivalents does not allow a claimed two-material strap to encompass a strap made of only one material. According to the appellate panel, such a reading would be “the fundamental opposite of the claimed invention”.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://orzecznictwo.net/wleklinski-dba-comfort-strapp-v-targus-fed-cir-2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

