C-251/95
Zagadnienia:
Likelihood of confusion.
Likelihood of association.
Znaki towarowe:
Puma.
Wnioski:
The criterion of “likelihood of confusion which includes the likelihood of association with the earlier mark” contained in Article 4(1)(b) of First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks is to be interpreted as meaning that the mere association which the public might make between two trade marks as a result of their analogous semantic content is not in itself a sufficient ground for concluding that there is a likelihood of confusion within the meaning of that provision.
Tekst wyroku:
C-251/95, Sabel.
Opublikowany:
—